🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold move to prohibit social platforms access for young people below 16 is sending ripples internationally. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and guardians are monitoring closely to see if this approach will inspire imitation for other nations.

Across Europe Trend

Throughout Europe, a rising number of countries are moving toward comparable measures.

• Denmark has announced a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the PM arguing that phones and platforms are "taking away our youngsters' childhood". Legislation may be passed in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is planning to implement a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to shield young people from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is working on a online verification tool to confirm the user details of social media account holders. Officials have suggested that an Australia-style ban could be "an options in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has urged parliament to enact a law raising the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the president has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has endorsed a similar action, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The government in The Netherlands has urged parents to restrict their children from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has passed a symbolic motion calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 except if a parent decides otherwise is granted. Even though it warns of the "habit-forming" design of these platforms, the step does not enact enforceable legislation.

"An effective age barrier is a solid starting point," stated a leading MEP supporting the resolution.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Stance

In the UK, the government has remained open to a future ban, emphasizing that "no option is being dismissed" but maintaining any policy must be "grounded in conclusive data".

Last year, momentum gathered behind a proposal to enact limits on social media use by minors, but it was eventually modified. Nonetheless, the government committed to investigate the issue.

Campaign organizations have expressed concerns. A prominent charity set up by the relatives of a girl who was lost after encountering harmful online content argues that a blanket age ban may not improve online safety and could create a "sudden drop-off" of risk when users become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the refusal of the social media companies to design products and services that are safe and suitable for minors," said a prominent child protection advocate.

The US: A Fragmented Approach

Stateside, action is primarily occurring at the local level due to country-wide inaction.

• Utah demands parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has signed a measure banning those below 14 from accessing social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has approved a regulation restricting under-16s to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with additional time dependent on adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also enacted bills demanding adult authorization for teenagers to open social media accounts.

Despite bipartisan support and calls from various figures to mimic this path, a US-wide ban is right now seen as unlikely.

Global Outlook

Outside of Europe and the US, additional nations are likewise considering moves.

• The Malaysian government intends to prohibit social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, global agencies strike a more nuanced position. A major UN agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "could prove counterproductive". The organization highlights that online platforms can be a "critical link" for marginalized children and that bans should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to prioritize user protection.

As this global discussion evolves, the steps of the Australian government and its followers indicate that policymakers internationally are no longer prepared to delay for the industry to self-regulate.